This is to respond to several recent allegations filed by XXXXX against the district consolidated into one IDEA complaint #01-012. Each allegation involved an IEP team meeting in which the LEA representative was not knowledgeable about and/or was not authorized to commit district resources to meet the needs of the child with a disability. Upon review and evaluation, we have determined that the facts and circumstances of these allegations are the same as those we have already identified as an area of systemic noncompliance in onsite monitoring activities in the district.
On February 1, 2001 (letter dated January 31, 2001), a complaint was filed with the Department of Public Instruction by XXXXX against the Milwaukee Public Schools. This complaint alleges a violation of special education law regarding the implementation of programs for children with disabilities.
On January 4, 2001 (letter dated January 4, 2001), a complaint was filed with the Department of Public Instruction by XXXXX against the Milwaukee Public Schools. This complaint alleges a violation of special education law regarding the implementation of programs for children with disabilities.
On October 30, 2002, the Department of Public Instruction received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against the Milwaukee Public Schools (MPS). This is the department's decision regarding that complaint. The issues are whether the district:
On July 31, 2002, the Department of Public Instruction received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against the Milwaukee Public Schools (MPS). The issue in this complaint is whether the district improperly changed the placements for three children with disabilities in June or July 2002. This is the department's decision regarding that complaint.
On August 29, 2003, the Department of Public Instruction received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against the Milwaukee Public Schools (MPS). This is the department's decision regarding that complaint. The issues are whether the district:
On December 20, 2001, the Department of Public Instruction received a complaint under state and federal special education law from XXXXX against Milwaukee Public Schools (MPS). The issue in this complaint is whether the district, by refusing to enroll a child from November 9, 2001, to January 14, 2002, failed to provide a free appropriate public education to a child with a disability residing in the district. This is the department's decision for that complaint. The decision is based on documents provided by the complainant and parent and interviews with district staff.
On June 3, 1999, a complaint was filed with the Department of Public Instruction by XXXXX against Milwaukee Public Schools (MPS). This complaint alleges a violation of special education law regarding the implementation of programs for children with disabilities.
On May 28, 1999 (letter dated May 27, 1999), a complaint was filed with the Department of Public Instruction by XXXXX against Milwaukee Public Schools. This complaint alleges a violation of special education law regarding the implementation of programs for children with disabilities.
On April 23, 1999 (letter dated April 22, 1999), a complaint was filed with the Department of Public Instruction by XXXXX against Milwaukee Public Schools. This complaint alleges a violation of special education law regarding the implementation of programs for children with disabilities.
